Ask questions via Twitter. Tweet any question to @AskFiLife and we will respond with an answer. More.

FiLife - In partnership with The Wall Street Journal

Your Financial LifelineTM

In partnership with The Wall Street Journal
 
 

Disclaimer

FiLife is a great place to get your finances in shape, and the expert advice in the community can help you address specific or general problems. But very often you’ll also need one-on-one advice from a professional, especially since rules and laws maybe specific to your state or country. Remember that investments and other financial transactions come with risk, and you should consult an independent, qualified professional before making financial commitments.

Stop Showing this Message

Question

Kristen Sullivan
FiLife Contributor

Kristen Sullivan asked 10 months ago in 401k Plans

Will the new administration do enough to strengthen retirement savings?

The stock market swoon hit retirement savers hard. Total U.S. 401(k) accounts fell to $2.5 trillion in 2008 from $3 trillion at the end of $2007, according to the Employee Benefits Research Institute. While less than the market’s 38% dip, the shock has many questioning the structure of America’s retirement savings system.

The Obama administration pledges to “strengthen retirement savings” in our country by:

1.) Protecting social security: The administration wants to phase in a plan asking those making more than $250,000 a year to pay two to four percent more in social security tax.

2.) Creating automatic workplace pensions: Employers who do not currently offer a retirement plan to employees will be required to automatically enroll employees into a direct-deposit IRA account. Employees may opt-out if they choose.

3.) Expanding retirement savings incentives for working families: Obama want to create a savings match for low and middle-income Americans. These workers don’t often benefit from employer-sponsored 401k match programs. The administration pledged to match 50 percent of the first $1,000 of savings for families that earn less than $75,000.

4.) Changing bankruptcy laws so they better protect workers and retirees. Corporate bankruptcy has become more frequent as the economy turns. Current law protect lenders before company workers. The new administration says it wants to change the rules so that promises made to workers are higher on the list of debts that companies cannot shed during a bankruptcy and retiree benefits can be reduced in fewer circumstances.

5.) Requiring companies to disclose pension investments: Obama wants to make sure that employees who have company pensions receive detailed information about their fund's investments every year.

Is this enough to improve retirement savings in our country? What about investment education? It’s obvious that we need to even the playing field and make it easier for everyone to put more money away for retirement…but we also have to teach people how to put that money away in a safe, smart way.

Will the Obama plan do enough?

Was this question interesting?

Yes

(0)

No

(0)

Permalink | Abuse

FiLife Recommends

Answer this Question
  • Share:
  •  

1 Answer

Sort by:
David R Hanson
FiLife Contributor
Reply

Kristen, I couldn't agree with you more on the need for better financial education. I'd argue that today it is MUCH more important that it was for prior generations. For example, in just the last few decades, most employers have switched from providing traditional pensions--so called "defined benefit" plans, where what you get is a function of salary and years of service--to "self-directed" plans, like 401(k) and IRA plans. Pensions didn't require much financial sophistication: you work, and a predictable stream of income is waiting for you. On the other hand, self-directed accounts require much more sophistication. How much do I invest? Which investments do I chose? How do I balance those investments with saving for college, after-tax savings, saving for a home, et cetera? And that's just one area! Using credit is far more complicated than it once was. There are far more ways to save than ever before. One could go on and on about this. But I'm sure I'm preaching to choir here, right? ;)

Anyway, given its importance today, I think a personal finance curriculum should be a mandatory component of high school graduation. And given that financial education of our residents is clearly in our national interest, I don't think the new administration would be out of line in championing such an initiative.

One other point. I think all the points in the Obama plan you mentioned are constructive, but we also are overdue for examining some underlying issues. Specifically, it's high time we had a national conversation about the degree to which our retirement, health care, and investment options should be self-directed and market-based. Is it prudent to place so much of a worker's fate on their financial savvy? On their timing and other good fortune? On whether their employers make wise choices not only in their benefit offerings, but on whether they manage to stay in business?

Despite what many tell us, there are no easy answers to these questions. When times were good, it was easy to simply ignore them. I don't think we can afford to do that any more.

Is this helpful?

Yes

(0)

No

(0)

Permalink | Abuse

Answer this Question

Generic User Image

Ask a Question

140 characters

Tips

  • Be specific and clear.
  • Be courteous and thoughtful.
  • Share some details about your situation (age, relationship, etc)

Login or Join

or login with

Ask a Question

140 characters

Expert Partners

Popular Keywords in 401k Plans

Stacker Poll of the Day

What age should you start your child's allowance?

Avg 8.5
 
Avg 8.5
 
248 responses