Create a Stacker
Send to Friends
Stacker Details
- Creator
- Barclay
- Creation Date
- March 26, 2009
- Replies
- Comments (22)
- Categories
- High Deductible Health Plans, Unemployment, Salary
Search Stackers
More Stackers
-

What age should you start your child's allowance?
Avg 8.5
by Allison | 248 users have completed this stacker
-

How much would you pay to watch one episode of your favorite TV show online, without any ads?
Avg $1.47
by Daniel | 228 users have completed this stacker
-

How old were you when you (or someone) opened your first savings account?
Avg 13
by Hank | 204 users have completed this stacker
Popular Stacker Keywords
401k baseball budget budgets car cars children college credit card credit cards date dating economy entertainment facebook food football home insurance investing kids marriage money mortgage recession retirement salary saving savings sex shopping spending sports stock market stocks travel tv twitter vacation workExpert Partners
Today’s Stacker Polls
-
At what age do you expect to retire?
-
How much allowance do you give your child each week?
-
What percentage of your monthly pay (after taxes) goes toward rent/mortgage?
-
How much do you spend on your kid's lunches each week?
-
How much would you pay for wifi access on a 6hr flight?
-
How much did you pay for back to school supplies?














Comments
Sort by:
Depressing. Depressing. I'm sticking with 12%.But what irks me about these unemployment figures is they don't seem to take into account there are certain jobs that pay minimum wage or below.. an adult can't live on such a wage yet it still counts as a "job."
Is this helpful?
Yes(6)
No(0)
Permalink | Abuse
Lynn Dalsing replied 3 months ago
I felt like this is the first time in the history of my listening to the news that this has been covered. I hear a lot about people who are "underemployed" -- not technically the same thing, but similar.
marilyn-e-fletcher replied about a month ago
YOU are right! I have two degrees, and years of experience but all the jobs I see in my field want to pay less than $15.00 per hour. I'm currently working 2 jobs and earning less than did in my previous position.
This is a very relevant question in these unfortunate economic times
Is this helpful?
Yes(2)
No(0)
Permalink | Abuse
Very relelvant in our current economic situation
Is this helpful?
Yes(1)
No(0)
Permalink | Abuse
This average seems realistic...currently.
Is this helpful?
Yes(2)
No(1)
Permalink | Abuse
The gov. hasn't accurately reported these figures since the 60's.
Is this helpful?
Yes(1)
No(0)
Permalink | Abuse
Todd Rubinstein replied 3 months ago
12.5%. Dave why don't you think the Gov "hasn't accurately reported these figures since the 60's"?
Lynn is absolutely right but I would exclude stay at home Moms since they are providing active support for the family bread winner. The others are muchers, mostly and they will always be cronically unemployed. I call them takers.....
Is this helpful?
Yes(0)
No(0)
Permalink | Abuse
Look at the Truely unemployed plus those who have given up...and you will see the reality...
Is this helpful?
Yes(0)
No(0)
Permalink | Abuse
Hank -- I hear that all the time, but really all of that is in the report. The economic situation report is about 25 pages long and has just about every breakdown you could imagine. Unemployed contract employees are reported, a variety of measures of part-time employment are included. Technically self-employed is employed so I'm not sure how its measure would be different from from the other measurements, but when they become unemployed it is measured. While it's not in the employment situation report, about a week later BLS releases the JOT (Job Openings and Turnover) report which includes how many people left their jobs voluntarily, or were laid off.
If all you look at is the topline numbers that you hear on the morning news, yes, that isn't a very useful number. But if you really are interested in this stuff you can find some very compelling information deep in the bowls of these reports that can give you a rather firm grasp on the current situation in the labor markets. BTW, the second differentials are really looking pretty good.
Is this helpful?
Yes(1)
No(1)
Permalink | Abuse
Hank, good info! I had no idea how employment numbers were calculated.
Is this helpful?
Yes(0)
No(0)
Permalink | Abuse
Dave makes a great point. The stats have been skewed and reported at odds with the true measure of unemployment for a very long time. For example, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics measures employment and unemployment (of those over 15 years of age) using two different labor force surveys conducted by the Census Bureau and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The unemployment figures don't indicate how many are not working for pay but those only actively seeking employment for pay. The statistic does not include volunteer unemployment, contractors looking for work, self-employed, under-employed, etc.
The current methods of measuring unemployment are inaccurate and do not take into account all the factors that lead to unemployment.
Is this helpful?
Yes(1)
No(1)
Permalink | Abuse
Lynn Dalsing replied 3 months ago
You have a point, but measuring the number of people who aren't actively seeking employment, but who are unemployed would include people in school, in jail, in mental institutions, and stay at home moms. Those people are not (on the whole) relevant to what the statistic is meant to measure. It may be inaccurate in total number, but it is more accurate in practicality than what you are suggesting.
Also, measuring unemployment doesn't require taking into account the factors that lead to unemployment. So I'm not clear on what you mean?
Post Comment