Ask questions via Twitter. Tweet any question to @AskFiLife and we will respond with an answer. More.

FiLife - In partnership with The Wall Street Journal

Your Financial LifelineTM

In partnership with The Wall Street Journal
 
 
  •  
    Report
Create a Stacker

Stacker Details

Creator
Alex
Staff
Alex
Creation Date
August 03, 2009
Replies
Comments (10)
Categories
Legal Concerns, Entertainment
Categories
drinking age, alcohol

Who's been stacked

Dominic Preuss Matthew Gould Robert Schmansky, CFP® Paul Kennard Minhthe Luu Aaron Shaw Susie Bafico Barclay
Send to Friends

Comments

Sort by:
Minhthe Luu
Staff
Reply

If I am correct on this, the legal drinking age can be set by each State. However, if a State sets its drinking age below 21 yrs old, they will lose a percentage of their transportation funding from the federal government.

With that said and politics aside, I think the drinking age should be 18yrs old. If you can vote; you can drink.

Is this helpful?

Yes

(1)

No

(0)

Permalink | Abuse

Alex
Staff
Reply

The subject is not related to personal finance and I think 21 is a perfectly reasonable age, but what does everyone else think? Should the drinking age be lowered? Should it even exist???

Last edited by Alex at 2009-08-17 12:00:31

Is this helpful?

Yes

(1)

No

(0)

Permalink | Abuse

10_large

yolo9 replied 3 months ago

establishing a 'drinking age' is an exercise in futility. We've had the age(in NY) at 21 thens 18. The number of drinking incidents and accidents has not be affected by age legislation.
Drinking, or not ,is a personal decision and the PERSON is more important than the AGE.

Lynn Dalsing
Bronze
Reply

Got to agree that if you can vote/fight for your country/be executed, you ought to be able to drink.

Is this helpful?

Yes

(0)

No

(0)

Permalink | Abuse

Matthew Gould
Staff
Reply

I have to agree with Paul's comment about being old enough to go to war. Although, Daniel brings up a good point about not having the driving and drinking age be the same, that definitely sounds like it would spell trouble.

I didn't know about the state transportation budget being affected if the age is below 21. That seems like it would change if more people knew about it...

Is this helpful?

Yes

(0)

No

(0)

Permalink | Abuse

Dmitriy Ioselevich
FiLife Contributor
Reply

Having come into conflict with this question first-hand I would have to say it should be 19. Allowing seniors in high school to drink would filter down to lower grades and create a problem. However, once in college the law is not really a restriction to obtaining alcohol and thus largely pointless. The U.S., by the way, has the highest drinking age in the world. Are American teenagers that irresponsible?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_drinking_age

Is this helpful?

Yes

(0)

No

(0)

Permalink | Abuse

Paul Kennard
Staff
Reply

18 yrs old, if you can die for Uncle Sam you should be able to drink with him!

Is this helpful?

Yes

(0)

No

(0)

Permalink | Abuse

Daniel
Staff
Reply

And Minthe you're exactly right about the tie-in with highway funding. One of those little-known facts that might have to change if more people knew about it.

Is this helpful?

Yes

(1)

No

(1)

Permalink | Abuse

Daniel
Staff
Reply

While I tend to think it should be lower, one thing that does concern me would be the drinking age and driving age being exactly the same. Those are two things that people have to wait so long to be allowed to do legally, and finally being allowed to do both at the same would invite trouble.

That said, I think the age should be lower (no higher than eighteen) and about teaching responsibility.

Is this helpful?

Yes

(0)

No

(0)

Permalink | Abuse

Barclay
Staff
Reply

Raise it. Those crazy kids! Why, when I was their age ...

Is this helpful?

Yes

(0)

No

(0)

Permalink | Abuse

Post Comment

Generic User Image

Search Stackers

More Stackers

Login or Join

or login with

Expert Partners

Ask a Question

140 characters