Ask questions via Twitter. Tweet any question to @AskFiLife and we will respond with an answer. More.

FiLife - In partnership with The Wall Street Journal

Your Financial LifelineTM

In partnership with The Wall Street Journal
 
 

Who Will Protect Us from the CFPA?


Share This

  •  
    Comments (4)

Sponsored by

President Barack Obama spent Friday afternoon stumping for the Consumer Financial Protection Agency.

The new regulating body, first proposed in June, would stand up for consumers in a broken world of financial regulation largely built on ensuring the safety of institutions and products.

The agency is for those “who signed contracts they didn’t always understand offered by lenders who didn’t always tell the truth.” In remarks this afternoon, the president added, “They were lured in by promises of low payments, and never made aware of the fine print and hidden fees.”

The issue, however, is that massive protection for the unwitting or the unknowing will end up creating more expensive and rigid products for everyone.

So before the administration and Congress press too hard on the reform button, they should look to the recent credit card bill for evidence.

Reuters blogger Felix Salmon rightly pointed out in a recent column that credit card rates for people assessed interest hit a low of 11.96% in early 2003, hit a high of 15.24% in August 2007 and after a slight dip are back to 14.90%.

Card companies, en masse, have been raising rates before the new laws fully take effect. This is at a time where borrowing costs FOR EVERYTHING ELSE are at all-time lows. Go figure.

The catch with new (and old) financial products is that we don’t know the extent of damage they can cause until they are abused.

Subprime mortgages used to be a backwater of the home loan industry, until everyone and their mother became a lender and every hedge fund wanted to own the loans. A credit card was supposed to serve as a convenient line-of-credit for a large transaction, until people started depending on them. Overdraft protection was supposed to fulfill your payment in the rare case that you didn’t have enough in your account, until rare become everyday.

Now, in these days of online accounts and quick transaction, the burden of overspending, overborrowing and overdrafting falls directly on us.

“This is not intended to take accountability away from consumers,” said Austan Goolsbee, a member of Obama’s Council of Economic Advisors. He and many others contend that the mish-mash of federal and state regulators allowed financial operators to “wiggle their way in between regulatory cracks.”

In this way, the Consumer Financial Protection Agency would be concerned about innovations that pose risks. But, as with any innovation, you never know the risk is there until it HITS.

If you truly want a Consumer Financial Protection Agency, start with yourself, your own financial education and then start working on your friends and family. Sure, the government should be there for you, but you need to be there first.  

“Caveat emptor” is the longest standing consumer warning for a good reason.


Category: Credit Cards, Mortgage

  •  
    Comments (4)
  •  

Comments

Sort by:
J David Lewis
FiLife Contributor
Reply

"If you truly want a Consumer Financial Protection Agency, start with yourself, your own financial education and then start working on your friends and family. Sure, the government should be there for you, but you need to be there first."

I hope to see a good debate over the issues of financial services reform. One of the great things about the debate over healthcare reform has been all the issues I understand so much better than I did before. I believe a similar debate over financial services will help people in similar ways. Maybe we will see how institutions respond to difficult questions. That may help us know who we can trust. Seeing the issues raised just might help people make better decisions, no matter how the final regulations turn out.

Is this helpful?

Yes

(1)

No

(0)

Permalink | Abuse

Morris Armstrong
FiLife Contributor
Reply

Ari

I am not sure that I agree with your statement that the borrowing costs for everything else are at an all time low. Certainly day to day money is cheap and the rates you earn on deposits is minimal however the premium that people and companies pay to borrow is high. Perhaps that is the way it should be, a more realistic assessment of borrowers risk is appropriate.

Is this helpful?

Yes

(1)

No

(0)

Permalink | Abuse

Ari_1223674069_large

Ari Weinberg replied about a month ago

Unsecured consumer credit rates, IMHO, are becoming more grounded in reality but asset-backed loans (mortgages, cars) are down as are borrowing rates for companies. Heck, firms are even getting equity capital. So, sure, credit card rates may be moving higher but soaring default rates are showing that risk wasn't accurately priced.

Morris-armstrong_1247609405_large

Morris Armstrong replied about a month ago

Nor were mortgage rates! When coupled with the new propensity for "strategic defaults" and declining values it is no wonder that underwriting has tightened. Rates are good for those with very good credit. We may have been spoiled.

Post Comment

Generic User Image

Login or Join

or login with

Expert Partners

Ask a Question

140 characters

Market Summary

INDU Chart
COMP Chart
SPX Chart

Enter Symbol or Keyword

Quote:
Separate multiple quotes with spaces

Stacker Poll of the Day

What age should you start your child's allowance?

Avg 8.5
 
Avg 8.5
 
246 responses